Repository logo
Communities & Collections
All of the eLibrary
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Samson, P"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 7 of 7
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Enhancing the sugar industry value chain by addressing mechanical harvest losses through research, technology and adoption : Final report 2016/901
    (Sugar Research Australia Limited, 2020) Manasta, G; Samson, P
    The project addressed the challenges of mechanical sugarcane harvesting, that include damage to the crop, cane loss from the harvester and high levels of extraneous matter sent to the mill. It did this by developing harvester modifications, new sensing technology and decision-support tools, better cane-cleaning systems, and delivering an adoption program to drive Harvesting Best Practice.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Expanded registration for Metarhizium strains against canegrubs : SRDC final project report BSS246
    (BSES, 2002) Samson, P; Milner, J; Bullard, G
    Eight fungicides and three liquid insecticides are registered in Queensland for application to sugarcane at planting, and these may come into contact with Metarhizium during application from cane planters. Seven of the chemicals were tested for deleterious effects on two Metarhizium isolates, FI-147 and FI-1045 (BioCane?), in laboratory and field experiments.In growth studies on medium, the fungicides Cane Strike? and Sportak? were about 10 times more toxic than Shirtan? and Tilt?, while toxicity of the latter fungicides was about 100 times that of the three insecticides Lorsban?, Talstar? and Regent? (based on active ingredient). When the amount of active ingredient in each product and field application rates are considered, the expected order of harmfulness in commercial use would be Regent < Talstar < Lorsban < Cane Strike < Tilt < Shirtan < Sportak.In a field experiment where Metarhizium granules were sprayed with each chemical (except Regent) at very high rates and then covered with soil, only Shirtan showed any toxic effect on spore viability, with a reduction from 82% to 69%. No harmful effect of any chemical was detected in counts of colony-forming units in soil samples or in bioassays of treated soil using negatoria and greyback canegrubs. No reduction was found in viability of FI-1045 on nine farms, where BioCane granules were applied though commercial planters with fungicide, compared with granules buried in untreated soil. Thus, we believe that BioCane is compatible with these chemicals in practice, and a label change for BioCane to include application at planting has been drafted with Bio-Care Technology Pty Ltd.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Farming systems that optimise the control of greyback canegrubs by BioCane� : SRDC final report BSS226
    (BSES, 2002) Samson, P; Logan, D; Milner, J; Kettle, C
    The carry-over of BioCane from one crop to the next is likely to be affected by soil cultivation during seedbed preparation. Metarhizium spores were concentrated in the rows in ratoon crops, either as spores surviving from the original BioCane application or as new spores produced by cadavers that are likely to be aggregated beneath stools. Soil disturbance was analysed using plastic beads as a marker. There was surprisingly little lateral displacement of the beads after cultivation. However, the rows themselves are likely to be displaced when crops are replanted unless minimum tillage planting into the old rows is practiced. In one field site prepared conventionally, spore concentrations were much lower in the new crop than they had been in the old crop.There was no effect of a trash blanket on grub response to BioCane in bins. Death of grubs following contact with BioCane may be slower at lower temperatures (<24?C), but the apparent difference was small. Spore concentrations in soil were not significantly affected by trash blanketing in most experiments. Overall, we were unable to conclude that trash blanketing will influence the efficacy of BioCane in commercial fields.There was no deleterious effect of the insecticides suSCon Plus, Confidor CR (controlled release) or Confidor SC (liquid), or of the fertilisers sulphur, gran-am or urea, on the survival of spores on BioCane granules in PVC rings. This is in agreement with field observations, where there have been no complaints from farmers who have applied BioCane close to some of these other products in commercial practice. However, abnormally low concentrations of spores in the rings indicate technical problems with the product that reduce confidence in the results.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Integrated pest management of stem borers and insect vectors of viral diseases of sugarcane : final report 2006/147
    (BSES, 2009) Magarey, R; Sallam, N; Samson, P
    This report provides detail on an ACIAR-funded project (HORT/2006/147) meeting between Australian and Indonesian staff to review project activities, and to plan further research, development and extension for the next 12 months. Rob Magarey also visited Jakarta to speak with ACIAR staff to keep them informed of project developments and outputs.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Pests of Australian sugarcane field guide
    (BSES, 2015) Samson, P; Sallam, N; Chandler, K
    This guide has been designed for practical ‘in-field’ use and text has been kept to a minimum.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Preparing the Australian sugar industry for exotic disease threats: final report 2009/033
    (Sugar Research Australia Limited, 2015) Magarey, R; Samson, P; Braithwaite, K; Thompson, N; Sallam, N
    Previous field resistance trial data for downy mildew, Ramu stunt and Sesamia grisescens collected in PNG since the mid-1980s were accessed, analysed and information used as a foundation for project field resistance screening research. 2. Pot methods for moth borer resistance screening were reviewed, a visit to South Africa was made to view pot trial methodology and rapid test resistance screening research plans developed. 3. Field resistance screening trials for the moth borers (Sesamia grisescens and Scirpophaga excerptalis) and the diseases (downy mildew, (Peronosclerospora spp.) and Ramu stunt (tenuivirus)) showed promise in project research. Data collected has been analysed and resistance ratings for Australian commercial varieties assigned and loaded into SPIDNet. 4. A rapid resistance screen for the moth borers (manual infestation of test plants) and downy mildew (using oospores mixed into potting soil) show promise, but each method requires further refinement. 5. The causal agent of Ramu stunt was confirmed as a tenuivirus and a diagnostic assay validated. Suspect disease specimens can now be confidently assayed, should an Australian incursion occur. Some pathogen variation was noted around PNG; it is unknown if this will affect varietal resistance reactions. 6. Molecular tools for assaying for downy mildew were also developed; suspect disease specimens for DM can also now be confidently assayed. Significant DM pathogen variation in PNG was noted, with three taxa identified. One of these may be a new Peronosclerospora species. 7. The project has led to major steps forward in relation to knowledge of these pests and diseases. Our capacity to identify, manage and advise the Australian sugarcane industry with regard to PNG pests and diseases has improved greatly. The industry is now in a strong position to deal with the major pest and disease threats present in PNG.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Review of moth-borer resistance screening and report on visit to SASRI
    (BSES, 2009) Samson, P
    Information on procedures for screening sugarcane varieties for resistance to moth borers and associated research was obtained by a search of literature and by a 2-week visit to SASRI

copyright © 2015-2025 Sugar Research Australia Ltd

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • Send Feedback