| Author | Smith, MA |
| Date Accessioned | 2013-05-01 |
| Date Available | 2013-05-01 |
| Issued | 1992 |
| Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/11079/11323 |
| Abstract | There are now two alternative methods of subsurface nitrogen placement available: beside the stool or into the stool. The second, into the stool treatment, is easier to accomplish. Comparison of cane yields from strips fertilised by the two methods revealed no significant differences. |
| Abstract | There are now two alternative methods of subsurface nitrogen placement available: beside the stool or into the stool. The second, into the stool treatment, is easier to accomplish. Comparison of cane yields from strips fertilised by the two methods revealed no significant differences. |
| Language | en |
| Part of Series | BSES Information Circular; 1992 No 559 Report IC92002 |
| Subject | Nitrogen |
| Subject | Fertiliser |
| Subject | Nitrogen placement |
| Title | Comparison of 'into' and 'beside' stool nitrogen placement |
