• Login
    View Item 
    •   eLibrary Home
    • Completed projects and reports
    • Farming systems and production management
    • View Item
    •   eLibrary Home
    • Completed projects and reports
    • Farming systems and production management
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Modified rotary-pinch chopper system for improved harvesting efficiency : SRDC Grower Group Innovation Project final report

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    HGP003 Final Report.pdf (2.535Mb)
    Date
    2007
    Author
    Smith, MA
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Bin weight is becoming an increasingly topical issue for the Australian sugar industry, with millers and haul-out contractors seeking to improve the efficiency of their operations by hauling more cane per trip using existing infrastructure. This has meant that there is considerable pressure within the industry to reduce billet length. This program of work aimed to facilitate the adoption of feedtrain/chopper synchronisation through the development of a modified rotary-pinch chopper system. The design principle is based on the concept of obtaining variable length billets through one revolution of the chopper drum, not through manipulating feedtrain roller speed. The conceptual design of the proof-of-concept modified rotary-pinch chopper system was developed and presented to Corradini Engineering for review, detailed design and manufacture. After fabrication the ‘Corradini’ proof-of-concept chopper system was installed on a harvester that is used to cut billets for planting and as a backup commercial machine. Initial comparative trials were successfully undertaken at Fairymead Plantation in Bundaberg during the 2006 harvest season. A standard 15-inch chopper system with unsynchronised (variable) and synchronised (uniform) feedtrain setup was compared with the ‘Corradini’ proofof- concept rotary-pinch chopper system (MRPCS) with synchronised feedtrain setup. The functionality of the ‘Corradini’ proof-of-concept MRPCS was assessed with no differences in operational performance observed or noted by the machine operator when compared with a standard 15-inch chopper system. This included no recirculation of billets and a throw velocity identical to that of a standard 15-inch system. In the 2006 trials, the ‘Standard’ chopper variable billet length treatment resulted in the greatest packing density, with 380 kg/m3 ,and the uniform length billets the lowest with 365 kg/m3. The packing density of the ‘Corradini’ proof-of-concept MRPCS variable length billet treatment was found to be 375 kg/m3 . The corresponding average reduction in bin weight from the standard chopper variable length billets was found to be 1%. Alternatively, an increase in bin weight of 2.7% was found when compared with the standard chopper uniform length billets.
    Collections
    • Farming systems and production management [226]

    Related items

    Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    • Improving the performance of chopper systems in cane harvesters : SRDC Final report BS188S 

      Norris, CP; Davis, RJ; Hockings, PR (1999)
    • Chop-throw; a potential driver for the next generation of pneumatic cleaning systems : SRDC Final report BS52S 

      Norris, CP (2000)
      The objective of this project was to determine if the chop-throw concept offered potential for high efficiency pneumatic cleaning systems, by virtue of the inherently high efflux velocities and billet presentation from the ...
    • Side-by-side trial examines after-market chopper systems 

      Pfeffer, B (Sugar Research Australia Limited, 2019)
      Side-by-side trial examines after-market chopper systems

    © Sugar Research Australia Limited 2015

    Terms & Conditions | Contact Us | Send Feedback

     
    Advanced Search

    Browse

    Whole eLibraryCommunities and collectionsBy issue dateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy issue dateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login

    © Sugar Research Australia Limited 2015

    Terms & Conditions | Contact Us | Send Feedback