Show simple item record

OrganisationUniversity of Southern Queensland (USQ)
OrganisationNational Centre for Engineering In Agriculture
AuthorHarris, H
Date Accessioned2014-03-03
Date Available2014-03-03
Issued2002
Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11079/13314
AbstractThis project followed on from Project US2 (Cutting of sugarcane), which showed that conventional basecutters and knockdown angles contributed to cane damage and loss by way of disk contact, multiple layered cuts and stalk bending.
AbstractThis project proposed that removing the use of knockdown as a primary process for feeding, and replacing the impact type cut with alternative means involving slicing cuts and serrated blade edges, would improve basecutting and feeding, and reduce the problems identified in project US2. The outcomes would be in the form of cutting and feeding modules available for retrofit or as original equipment.
AbstractThe project planned to proceed by way of laboratory tests using an existing single cut device, modified to simulate the effects of harvester forward speed, followed by development of feeding means using a dedicated tractor based harvester. The laboratory trials were completed as planned, but the field trials were abandoned because of the take up of initial results by industry innovators, and the logistical difficulties of supporting a research harvester in the commercial environment.
AbstractThe research undertaken in this project was primarily aimed at creating an understanding of the processes involved in cutting cane, and then using this understanding to propose and develop modifications to the conventional basecutter. The hypothesis of this research was that it is possible to improve the base cutting process in sugar cane (reducing force, energy and damage) by making a slicing cut instead of the conventional impact cut, where the cutting edge contacts the cane with its velocity oriented in the same direction as the radius to the point of contact. In Project US2, it was demonstrated that a slicing cut, when attempted using a curved edge, would push the cane aside without cutting, so serrated edges were suggested to avoid this problem.
Languageen
PublisherSRDC
Part of SeriesInternal report; 2002
Related Documenthttp://hdl.handle.net/11079/14251
Related Documenthttp://hdl.handle.net/11079/14252
SubjectBasecutter
SubjectCane losses
SubjectHarvester
SubjectHarvesting
SubjectFarming systems
SubjectProduction management
TitleImprovements in base cutter design and cane feeding : Final report NCE004


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Farming systems and production management [226]
    Research outcomes: Growers and harvesters benefit from the ongoing research in productivity improvement, production management and agronomical techniques. Developed technologies and management practices that enhance productivity and demonstrate a high rate of return on investment

Show simple item record