Implementation of irrigation practices for profitable resource efficient sugarcane production in the Ord : Final report CSE007
Abstract
Sugarcane is currently the major crop in the Ord River Irrigation Area (ORIA) in terms of area, occupying
approximately 4000 hectares or a third of the irrigable area. It is also possible that further expansion could occur soon
within the Ord Stage 2 area. The new industry is continuing to develop guidelines for and to initiate implementation of
best management practice, to ensure the development of a profitable and sustainable industry. This project
contributed to the provision of an extension service which is critical in assisting the industry in this development.
Irrigation water application in excess of 30 ML ha-1 yr-1 was common commercial practice when sugarcane production
commenced in 1995. High irrigation application not only impacted on profitability but also contributed to rising water
tables and land degradation. Consequently this project aimed to build capacity in the community to save water and
labour and to reduce rising water tables. The APSIM-Sugarcane model (Keating et al., 1999) enabled the initial testing of scientific hypotheses of
sugarcane production in the Ord. During the previous SRDC project (CSR022) certain adjustments were required
for APSIM simulations under Ord conditions but these were not entirely satisfactory. In CSE007 it was necessary to
introduce growers to a framework based on the Penman-Monteith (PM) equation. This framework is concerned
mainly with daily crop evapotranspiration (ETC) for which it is more suited than APSIM-Sugarcane but does not
consider much detail on crop physiology or soil physics. A number of experiments were conducted to improve
both the APSIM and PM frameworks for a better working knowledge of the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum in
the Ord. From the APSIM based scheduling experiments we concluded that a 50% soil water deficit represented the lower
limit of readily available water (RAW). It was then possible to derive RAW values (56 to 68 mm) for the major soil
types in the Ord in the interests of balancing requirements for high sugar yields and reduced water use. Lodging
rules introduced to APSIM for conditions in the east were able to explain a ‘slow-down’ phenomenon noted
repeatedly in earlier experiments after about 30 t ha-1 biomass had been produced. More recently an early ratoon
crop accumulated biomass rapidly up to 55 t ha-1 before slowing down. While the slow down was triggered by a
combination of crop mass, soil water content and storm rainfall the physiology of the slow growth process
remains unresolved. The project made extensive use of a Bowen ratio energy balance (BREB) system which measures energy being
used to evaporate water from the crop and soil (ETC). Daily water use in the Ord seldom exceeded 8 mm d-1
compared to original estimates from APSIM of more than 12 mm d-1. Annual net irrigation requirement based on
the PM framework was 670 to 1628 mm and these estimates have been used to assess water requirements for
sugarcane production in Ord stage 2. The recent establishment of irrigated sugarcane in the Ord offered a chance to try new concepts of participatory
action research (PAR). The end result of the PAR process was ‘WaterBalance’, a computer program which
growers adopted readily as a scheduling tool as a result of their involvement in its development. In January 2006,
three Ord growers were actively using the prototype WaterBalance to schedule their irrigations. These growers
had a total of 22 blocks on the system. A fourth grower obtained weekly updates on the current scheduling
interval via fax or email. WaterBalance was later superseded by WaterSense which combined WaterBalance with
an earlier web-based irrigation tool for growers using limited water in the Bundaberg/Isis region. One Ord grower
continues to use WaterBalance while the others have switched to WaterSense which has now been endorsed by the
BSES Limited and the Cooperative Research Centre for Irrigation Futures. In all regions adoption by those growers
familiar with the background research has been immediate. Indications are that the combined use of the Internet, PAR
and concurrent research and demonstration will open the way for the adoption of research findings in the
management of irrigation and possibly other aspects of sugarcane farming. Evaluation surveys were conducted in 2003, 2004 and 2006 to assess perceptions and practices about irrigation and
how these were influenced by the project. The 2004 and 2006 surveys in particular indicated how much irrigation
practices had changed since the initial benchmarking survey was conducted by Wood et al (1998). This original
survey reported an average water application per crop of 40 ML ha-1 and by 2006 growers reported an average
use of nearly half this amount.
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Supplementary irrigation: does it pay?
Eden, J (BSES, 2011)As growers, we all know that a consistent and adequate supply of water is cruicial for improved productivity and viability. The Central production region has one of the most variable climates in the world. Coupled with ... -
Increased profitability and water use efficiency through best use of limited water under supplementary irrigation : SRDC Final report CSE001
Inman-Bamber, NG (SRDC, 2005)The objectives of this project towards increased profitability and water use efficiency was to: -
Evaluating alternative irrigation for a greener future
Hesp, C (2011)The potential agronomic and environmental benefits of green cane harvesting and trash blanketing, the ongoing issues of nutrients and pesticides threatening the Great Barrier Reef, the rising ground water levels in the ...