Regenerating a soil food web capable of improving soil health and reducing losses from soilborne pests and pathogens of sugarcane: final report 2014/004
MetadataShow full item record
When the Sugar Yield Decline Joint Venture concluded in 2006, its main legacy was a new sugarcane farming system based on legume breaks, minimum tillage, controlled traffic and trash retention. Many economic benefits were obtained when the new system was adopted and soil physical and chemical properties also improved. However, the main biological improvements were temporary reductions in the number of nematode pests and cane-specific pathogens following the rotation crop. The aims of this project were to determine whether the soil biology had improved after this system had been in place for several crop cycles; assess the suppressiveness of the soils to nematode pests; identify the antagonists involved; and understand the effects of management on nematode suppression. Observations in 12 fields that had been farmed using the SYDJV system for 7-12 years indicated that most of the roots were unhealthy and that the nematode community was dominated by plantparasitic nematodes. The soil just below the trash blanket was much healthier as roots were functional, carbon levels were high and populations of plant-parasitic nematodes were being suppressed by their natural enemies. Previous work had shown that nematode-trapping fungi and predatory nematodes were important suppressive agents in sugarcane soils but studies undertaken in this project showed that predatory mites such as Protogamasellus mica and bacteria in the genus Pasteuria could also contribute. Evidence was obtained to indicate that trash blanketing enhanced suppressiveness to nematode pests whereas tillage and nitrogen inputs were detrimental. However, the main reason sugarcane soils had lost the capacity to regulate nematode populations was that their carbon contents were 50-80% below the levels attainable in a given soil type and environment. Attempts to increase suppressiveness with organic amendments were sometimes successful but the benefits obtained depended on the composition of the amendment, application rate and the method of application.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this itemhttp://hdl.handle.net/11079/16939
Contact Us | Send Feedback
- © Sugar Research Australia Limited 2015
- Copyright in this document is owned by Sugar Research Australia Limited (SRA) or by one or more other parties which have provided it to SRA, as indicated in the document. With the exception of any material protected by a trade mark, this document is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International licence (as described through this link). Any use of this publication, other than as authorised under this licence or copyright law, is prohibited.
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode - This link takes you to the relevant licence conditions, including the full legal code.
- In referencing this document, please use the citation identified in the document.
- In this disclaimer a reference to "SRA" means Sugar Research Australia Ltd and its directors, officers, employees, contractors and agents.
- This document has been prepared in good faith by the organisation or individual named in the document on the basis of information available to them at the date of publication without any independent verification. Although SRA does its best to present information that is correct and accurate, to the full extent permitted by law SRA makes no warranties, guarantees or representations about the suitability, reliability, currency or accuracy of the information in this document, for any purposes.
- The information contained in this document (including tests, inspections and recommendations) is produced for general information only. It is not intended as professional advice on any particular matter. No person should act or fail to act on the basis of any information contained in this document without first conducting independent inquiries and obtaining specific and independent professional advice as appropriate.
- To the full extent permitted by law, SRA expressly disclaims all and any liability to any persons in respect of anything done by any such person in reliance (whether in whole or in part) on any information contained in this document, including any loss, damage, cost or expense incurred by any such persons as a result of the use of, or reliance on, any information in this document.
- The views expressed in this publication are not necessarily those of SRA.
- Any copies made of this document or any part of it must incorporate this disclaimer.