Molecular assay of major soilborne sugarcane pathogens for better exploitation of commercial varieties
Final report 2016/047
A commercial assay service, based on specific DNA tests for soil-borne pathogens, has been developed for various cropping industries by the South Australian Research and Development Institute (SARDI), Adelaide. A unique feature of the DNA testing service is the ability to assay 500 g of soil in a single test, a breakthrough made possible by SARDI researchers, enabling the reliable, sensitive detection of root pathogens. The assay service now provides feedback on a range of deleterious, as well as beneficial, organisms in the grains and horticultural industries across southern Australia and in cereals in NSW and southern Queensland. This has provided important decision-making information for the application of better soil-borne disease management strategies. The service is now expanding further into northern Australia. Specific DNA assays were developed in this project for the major root pathogens / parasites in the Australian sugarcane industry (Pachymetra chaunorhiza and Pratylenchus zeae; Meloidogyne species tests were developed much earlier. The results from these assays were compared to traditional manual assessment. There was very good agreement between manual counts and the DNA results for Pachymetra chaunorhiza, and the two major nematode root parasites, Pratylenchus zeae (root lesion) and Meloidogyne species (root knot). This suggests that the SARDI laboratory could provide an assay service for these organisms in the sugarcane industry. Advantages of the SARDI service include the ability to rapidly assay large sample numbers (>80 in a batch), to be able to apply multiple tests to single soil samples, and to potentially do this testing at a reduced cost compared to the normal manual tests. In addition, the molecular nematode assays do not require nematode viability to be as carefully maintained for accurate assay results. Disadvantages of the molecular assay method are the potential for increased assay costs with small sample batch sizes; a slightly less-sensitive assay for Pachymetra chaunorhiza (compared to the traditional counting method) and potential slower turnaround times with limited sample numbers flowing through the laboratory. Southern experience suggests that additional tests will be added once the service is initiated, with better all-round information on soil biology resulting. A recommendation from the project is for SARDI to be contracted to undertake the molecular assays while the Tully soil assay laboratory maintains assay recommendation and data warehousing roles. Results from this project were extended to industry, which is now in a place to adopt the assay service provided by SRA / SARDI.
Please use this to cite or link to this itemhttps://hdl.handle.net/11079/17971
Contact Us | Send Feedback
- © Sugar Research Australia Limited 2015
- Copyright in this document is owned by Sugar Research Australia Limited (SRA) or by one or more other parties which have provided it to SRA, as indicated in the document. With the exception of any material protected by a trade mark, this document is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International licence (as described through this link). Any use of this publication, other than as authorised under this licence or copyright law, is prohibited.
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode - This link takes you to the relevant licence conditions, including the full legal code.
- In referencing this document, please use the citation identified in the document.
- In this disclaimer a reference to "SRA" means Sugar Research Australia Ltd and its directors, officers, employees, contractors and agents.
- This document has been prepared in good faith by the organisation or individual named in the document on the basis of information available to them at the date of publication without any independent verification. Although SRA does its best to present information that is correct and accurate, to the full extent permitted by law SRA makes no warranties, guarantees or representations about the suitability, reliability, currency or accuracy of the information in this document, for any purposes.
- The information contained in this document (including tests, inspections and recommendations) is produced for general information only. It is not intended as professional advice on any particular matter. No person should act or fail to act on the basis of any information contained in this document without first conducting independent inquiries and obtaining specific and independent professional advice as appropriate.
- To the full extent permitted by law, SRA expressly disclaims all and any liability to any persons in respect of anything done by any such person in reliance (whether in whole or in part) on any information contained in this document, including any loss, damage, cost or expense incurred by any such persons as a result of the use of, or reliance on, any information in this document.
- The views expressed in this publication are not necessarily those of SRA.
- Any copies made of this document or any part of it must incorporate this disclaimer.